1979 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1966 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1979 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,098 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Riley Kestrel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Autobianchi A 112 (57 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1979 Autobianchi A 112 should accelerate faster than 1966 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Riley Kestrel weights approximately 210 kg more than 1979 Autobianchi A 112.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Riley Kestrel (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Autobianchi A 112. (73 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1966 Riley Kestrel will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Autobianchi A 112.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Autobianchi A 112 | 1966 Riley Kestrel | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Riley |
| Model | A 112 | Kestrel |
| Year Released | 1979 | 1966 |
| Engine Size | 928 cc | 1098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 57 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 73 Nm | 83 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 675 kg | 885 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3230 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 25 L |
