1979 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2006 MG ZT
To start off, 2006 MG ZT is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 MG ZT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 MG ZT weights approximately 900 kg more than 1979 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 2006 MG ZT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 MG ZT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Autobianchi A 112 | 2006 MG ZT | |
Make | Autobianchi | MG |
Model | A 112 | ZT |
Year Released | 1979 | 2006 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 256 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 65 L |