1979 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2006 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2006 Toyota Matrix is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 1,784 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 710 kg more than 1979 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 2006 Toyota Matrix is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Autobianchi A 112. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Autobianchi A 112 | 2006 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Toyota |
| Model | A 112 | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 1784 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1370 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 45 L |
