1979 BMW 320 vs. 2000 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 BMW 320 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 BMW 320 (641 HP @ 9000 RPM) has 511 more horse power than 2000 Ford Mustang. (130 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1979 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Mustang weights approximately 458 kg more than 1979 BMW 320.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 BMW 320 | 2000 Ford Mustang | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 320 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1979 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 641 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 9000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1298 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2580 mm |