1979 BMW 320 vs. 2010 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2010 Toyota Matrix is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 BMW 320 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 BMW 320 (641 HP @ 9000 RPM) has 483 more horse power than 2010 Toyota Matrix. (158 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1979 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 2010 Toyota Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 584 kg more than 1979 BMW 320.
Because 1979 BMW 320 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 BMW 320. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 BMW 320 | 2010 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | BMW | Toyota |
Model | 320 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1979 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 641 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 9000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1424 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4394 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2601 mm |