1979 BMW 320 vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 BMW 320 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 BMW 320 (641 HP) has 488 more horse power than 2012 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1979 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Epica.
Because 1979 BMW 320 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 BMW 320. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 1979 BMW 320 has manual transmission. 1979 BMW 320 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 BMW 320 | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | 320 | Epica |
Year Released | 1979 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 641 HP | 153 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2700 mm |