1979 Bristol 412 vs. 1968 Jaguar E Type
To start off, 1979 Bristol 412 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar E Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar E Type would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Bristol 412 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Jaguar E Type (226 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1979 Bristol 412. (171 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Jaguar E Type should accelerate faster than 1979 Bristol 412. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Bristol 412 weights approximately 290 kg more than 1968 Jaguar E Type.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Bristol 412 | 1968 Jaguar E Type | |
Make | Bristol | Jaguar |
Model | 412 | E Type |
Year Released | 1979 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 4235 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 171 HP | 226 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 92.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.9 mm | 106 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1190 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2450 mm |