1979 Bristol 412 vs. 2005 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2005 Toyota Matrix is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Bristol 412. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Bristol 412 would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Bristol 412 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Bristol 412 (171 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2005 Toyota Matrix. (130 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1979 Bristol 412 should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Bristol 412 weights approximately 465 kg more than 2005 Toyota Matrix. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1979 Bristol 412 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Bristol 412. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Bristol 412 (366 Nm) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota Matrix. (170 Nm). This means 1979 Bristol 412 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Bristol 412 | 2005 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Bristol | Toyota |
Model | 412 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1979 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 1786 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 171 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 366 Nm | 170 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 79.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.9 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 1225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2500 mm |