1979 Bristol 412 vs. 2006 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Bristol 412. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Bristol 412 would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Bristol 412 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Equinox (186 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1979 Bristol 412. (171 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1979 Bristol 412. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 60 kg more than 1979 Bristol 412. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Chevrolet Equinox is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Bristol 412. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Equinox will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Bristol 412 (366 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Chevrolet Equinox. (285 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1979 Bristol 412 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Chevrolet Equinox.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Bristol 412 | 2006 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | Bristol | Chevrolet |
Model | 412 | Equinox |
Year Released | 1979 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 3425 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 171 HP | 186 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 366 Nm | 285 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.9 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 1750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2860 mm |