1979 Bristol 412 vs. 2006 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2006 Dodge Charger is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Bristol 412. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Bristol 412 would be higher. At 6,063 cc, 2006 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Charger (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 254 more horse power than 1979 Bristol 412. (171 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1979 Bristol 412.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Charger (570 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Bristol 412. (366 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Bristol 412.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Bristol 412 | 2006 Dodge Charger | |
Make | Bristol | Dodge |
Model | 412 | Charger |
Year Released | 1979 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 6063 cc |
Horse Power | 171 HP | 425 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 366 Nm | 570 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3050 mm |