1979 Buick Skyhawk vs. 1982 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1982 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Buick Skyhawk weights approximately 585 kg more than 1982 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1979 Buick Skyhawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Buick Skyhawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1979 Buick Skyhawk has automatic transmission and 1982 Volkswagen Polo has manual transmission. 1982 Volkswagen Polo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Buick Skyhawk will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Buick Skyhawk | 1982 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Buick | Volkswagen |
Model | Skyhawk | Polo |
Year Released | 1979 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1272 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1335 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2340 mm |