1979 Buick Skyhawk vs. 1999 Rover 25
To start off, 1999 Rover 25 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Buick Skyhawk weights approximately 305 kg more than 1999 Rover 25.
Because 1979 Buick Skyhawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Buick Skyhawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Rover 25, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1979 Buick Skyhawk has automatic transmission and 1999 Rover 25 has manual transmission. 1999 Rover 25 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Buick Skyhawk will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Buick Skyhawk | 1999 Rover 25 | |
| Make | Buick | Rover |
| Model | Skyhawk | 25 |
| Year Released | 1979 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1588 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 103 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1335 kg | 1030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2510 mm |
