1979 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2006 Holden UTE
To start off, 2006 Holden UTE is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Holden UTE weights approximately 165 kg more than 1979 Buick Skyhawk.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Buick Skyhawk | 2006 Holden UTE | |
Make | Buick | Holden |
Model | Skyhawk | UTE |
Year Released | 1979 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 3789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 204 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1335 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2950 mm |