1979 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2010 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2010 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda BT-50 weights approximately 215 kg more than 1979 Buick Skyhawk.
Because 2010 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Buick Skyhawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1979 Buick Skyhawk has automatic transmission and 2010 Mazda BT-50 has manual transmission. 2010 Mazda BT-50 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Buick Skyhawk will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Buick Skyhawk | 2010 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Buick | Mazda |
Model | Skyhawk | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1979 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 2606 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 123 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1335 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3010 mm |