1979 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1963 Rover 2000
To start off, 1979 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 738 kg more than 1963 Rover 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Cadillac Brougham | 1963 Rover 2000 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Rover |
| Model | Brougham | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1979 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5032 cc | 1978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 91 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1212 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2630 mm |
