1979 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1998 Alfa Romeo 146
To start off, 1998 Alfa Romeo 146 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 775 kg more than 1998 Alfa Romeo 146.
Because 1979 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Alfa Romeo 146, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Cadillac Brougham | 1998 Alfa Romeo 146 | |
Make | Cadillac | Alfa Romeo |
Model | Brougham | 146 |
Year Released | 1979 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5032 cc | 1351 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 90 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2550 mm |