1979 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 831 kg more than 2000 Toyota Celica.
Because 1979 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Cadillac Brougham | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | Brougham | Celica |
Year Released | 1979 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5032 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 189 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1119 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2610 mm |