1979 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2001 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2001 Ford Ranger is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 160 kg more than 2001 Ford Ranger.
Because 2001 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Cadillac Brougham | 2001 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | Brougham | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2001 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5032 cc | 2970 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1790 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 3010 mm |
