1979 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2002 Mazda AZ
To start off, 2002 Mazda AZ is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1200 kg more than 2002 Mazda AZ.
Because 2002 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Cadillac Brougham | 2002 Mazda AZ | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | Brougham | AZ |
Year Released | 1979 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5032 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2370 mm |