1979 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1966 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 1979 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercedes-Benz SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercedes-Benz SL would be higher. At 6,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 610 kg more than 1966 Mercedes-Benz SL.
Because 1966 Mercedes-Benz SL is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercedes-Benz SL. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Cadillac DeVille | 1966 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | DeVille | SL |
Year Released | 1979 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6030 cc | 2306 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 149 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2410 mm |