1979 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1982 Volvo 265
To start off, 1982 Volvo 265 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 490 kg more than 1982 Volvo 265.
Because 1982 Volvo 265 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Volvo 265. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Cadillac DeVille | 1982 Volvo 265 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | DeVille | 265 |
| Year Released | 1979 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6030 cc | 2848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1420 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2660 mm |
