1979 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2008 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2008 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2008 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Cadillac DeVille | 2008 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | DeVille | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1979 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6030 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2710 mm |