1979 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1978 Mazda 929
To start off, 1979 Cadillac Eldorado is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Cadillac Eldorado (168 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 929. (90 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1979 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 570 kg more than 1978 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1978 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Cadillac Eldorado (365 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1979 Cadillac Eldorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Cadillac Eldorado | 1978 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | Eldorado | 929 |
Year Released | 1979 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5735 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 365 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 103 mm | 80.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 98 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 8.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2620 mm |