1979 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1996 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 1996 Mazda RX-01 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda RX-01 (217 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1979 Cadillac Eldorado. (168 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 1979 Cadillac Eldorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 620 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Cadillac Eldorado (365 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda RX-01. (220 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 1979 Cadillac Eldorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Cadillac Eldorado | 1996 Mazda RX-01 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | Eldorado | RX-01 |
| Year Released | 1979 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5735 cc | 2615 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 8500 RPM |
| Torque | 365 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2350 mm |
