1979 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (195 HP) has 95 more horse power than 1979 Chevrolet Blazer. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 1979 Chevrolet Blazer.
Because 1979 Chevrolet Blazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Chevrolet Blazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Chevrolet Blazer (242 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 1979 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Chevrolet Blazer | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Blazer | FTO |
| Year Released | 1979 | 1996 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4093 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 195 HP |
| Torque | 242 Nm | 202 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1300 mm |
