1979 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,091 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (237 HP) has 108 more horse power than 1979 Chevrolet Blazer. (129 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1979 Chevrolet Blazer.
Because 1979 Chevrolet Blazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Jaguar XF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Chevrolet Blazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (500 Nm) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Chevrolet Blazer. (285 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Chevrolet Blazer.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Chevrolet Blazer | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
Model | Blazer | XF |
Year Released | 1979 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4091 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 237 HP |
Torque | 285 Nm | 500 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2908 mm |