1979 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1978 Volvo 66
To start off, 1979 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Chevrolet Camaro (165 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1979 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 765 kg more than 1978 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Chevrolet Camaro | 1978 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
| Model | Camaro | 66 |
| Year Released | 1979 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5735 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1390 mm |
