1979 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2002 Honda Odyssey
To start off, 2002 Honda Odyssey is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Honda Odyssey weights approximately 415 kg more than 1979 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 2002 Honda Odyssey is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Odyssey will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Honda Odyssey has automatic transmission and 1979 Chevrolet Camaro has manual transmission. 1979 Chevrolet Camaro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Honda Odyssey will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Chevrolet Camaro | 2002 Honda Odyssey | |
Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
Model | Camaro | Odyssey |
Year Released | 1979 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4097 cc | 2298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 1970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3010 mm |