1979 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1968 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1979 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 836 kg more than 1968 ZAZ 966.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Chevrolet Impala | 1968 ZAZ 966 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | ZAZ |
| Model | Impala | 966 |
| Year Released | 1979 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3790 cc | 1196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 38 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 774 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5460 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2170 mm |
