1979 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1980 Mini MK IV
To start off, 1980 Mini MK IV is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 1000 kg more than 1980 Mini MK IV.
Because 1979 Chevrolet Impala is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Chevrolet Impala. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Mini MK IV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1979 Chevrolet Impala has automatic transmission and 1980 Mini MK IV has manual transmission. 1980 Mini MK IV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Chevrolet Impala will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Chevrolet Impala | 1980 Mini MK IV | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mini |
| Model | Impala | MK IV |
| Year Released | 1979 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3790 cc | 848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 34 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5460 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2040 mm |
