1979 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1996 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1996 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 575 kg more than 1996 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1979 Chevrolet Impala is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Chevrolet Impala. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Chevrolet Impala | 1996 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Volkswagen |
| Model | Impala | Polo |
| Year Released | 1979 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3790 cc | 1896 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 63 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1035 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5400 mm | 3720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2410 mm |
