1979 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2006 Holden Epica
To start off, 2006 Holden Epica is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1979 Chevrolet Impala is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Chevrolet Impala. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Chevrolet Impala | 2006 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | Impala | Epica |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3790 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5400 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2700 mm |
