1979 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2006 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2006 Smart ForTwo is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 725 kg more than 2006 Smart ForTwo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Chevrolet Impala | 2006 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Smart |
Model | Impala | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1979 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 60 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 885 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5400 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 1820 mm |