1979 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2008 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2008 Volvo XC90 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 570 kg more than 1979 Chevrolet Impala.
Because 2008 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Chevrolet Impala. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Chevrolet Impala | 2008 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
| Model | Impala | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3790 cc | 2401 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 182 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 2180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5460 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2860 mm |
