1979 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2013 Mazda 2
To start off, 2013 Mazda 2 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 567 kg more than 2013 Mazda 2.
Because 1979 Chevrolet Impala is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Chevrolet Impala. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1979 Chevrolet Impala has automatic transmission and 2013 Mazda 2 has manual transmission. 2013 Mazda 2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Chevrolet Impala will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Chevrolet Impala | 2013 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Impala | 2 |
Year Released | 1979 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1043 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5460 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1694 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1476 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2489 mm |