1979 Chevrolet K-20 vs. 1996 Ford Ka
To start off, 1996 Ford Ka is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chevrolet K-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chevrolet K-20 would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Chevrolet K-20 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1979 Chevrolet K-20 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Ford Ka. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Chevrolet K-20 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1979 Chevrolet K-20 has automatic transmission and 1996 Ford Ka has manual transmission. 1996 Ford Ka will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Chevrolet K-20 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Chevrolet K-20 | 1996 Ford Ka | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | K-20 | Ka |
| Year Released | 1979 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5735 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 58 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
