1979 Chevrolet K-20 vs. 2004 Chrysler Crossfire
To start off, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chevrolet K-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chevrolet K-20 would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Chevrolet K-20 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1979 Chevrolet K-20 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Chrysler Crossfire. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Chevrolet K-20 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1979 Chevrolet K-20 has automatic transmission and 2004 Chrysler Crossfire has manual transmission. 2004 Chrysler Crossfire will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Chevrolet K-20 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Chevrolet K-20 | 2004 Chrysler Crossfire | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chrysler |
Model | K-20 | Crossfire |
Year Released | 1979 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5735 cc | 3196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 215 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |