1979 Chevrolet K-20 vs. 2010 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2010 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chevrolet K-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chevrolet K-20 would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Chevrolet K-20 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1979 Chevrolet K-20 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Mazda RX-8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Chevrolet K-20 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1979 Chevrolet K-20 has automatic transmission and 2010 Mazda RX-8 has manual transmission. 2010 Mazda RX-8 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Chevrolet K-20 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Chevrolet K-20 | 2010 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | K-20 | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1979 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5735 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 232 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |