1979 Chevrolet K-20 vs. 2011 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2011 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chevrolet K-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chevrolet K-20 would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Chevrolet K-20 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1979 Chevrolet K-20 has automatic transmission and 2011 Mazda BT-50 has manual transmission. 2011 Mazda BT-50 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Chevrolet K-20 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Chevrolet K-20 | 2011 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | K-20 | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1979 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5735 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 154 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |