1979 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1962 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1979 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 400 kg more than 1979 Chevrolet Malibu.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Chevrolet Malibu | 1962 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Malibu | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1979 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 6964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 345 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2880 mm |