1979 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2000 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2000 Honda CR-V is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Honda CR-V weights approximately 25 kg more than 1979 Chevrolet Malibu.
Because 2000 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Chevrolet Malibu. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Chevrolet Malibu | 2000 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
| Model | Malibu | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3790 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1745 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2620 mm |
