1979 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2002 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2002 Volvo XC90 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 639 kg more than 1979 Chevrolet Malibu.
Because 2002 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Chevrolet Malibu. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Chevrolet Malibu | 2002 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Malibu | XC90 |
Year Released | 1979 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 160 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 2114 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2800 mm |