1979 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 541 kg more than 1979 Chevrolet Malibu.
Because 2004 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Chevrolet Malibu. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Chevrolet Malibu | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Malibu | Tundra |
Year Released | 1979 | 2004 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 3376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 188 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 2016 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3270 mm |