1979 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 440 kg more than 1979 Chevrolet Malibu.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1979 Chevrolet Malibu has automatic transmission and 2010 Cadillac CTS-V has manual transmission. 2010 Cadillac CTS-V will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Chevrolet Malibu will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Chevrolet Malibu | 2010 Cadillac CTS-V | |
Make | Chevrolet | Cadillac |
Model | Malibu | CTS-V |
Year Released | 1979 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 556 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4867 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1455 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2880 mm |