1979 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 303 kg more than 1979 Chevrolet Malibu.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Chevrolet Malibu | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Chevrolet | Cadillac |
Model | Malibu | CTS |
Year Released | 1979 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 318 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1778 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4788 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1422 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2880 mm |