1979 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2013 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2013 Honda CR-Z is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 279 kg more than 2013 Honda CR-Z.
Because 1979 Chevrolet Malibu is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Chevrolet Malibu. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Honda CR-Z, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1979 Chevrolet Malibu has automatic transmission and 2013 Honda CR-Z has manual transmission. 2013 Honda CR-Z will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Chevrolet Malibu will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Chevrolet Malibu | 2013 Honda CR-Z | |
Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
Model | Malibu | CR-Z |
Year Released | 1979 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 120 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1196 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4079 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2435 mm |