1979 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1979 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1979 Chevrolet Monte Carlo has automatic transmission and 2003 Ford Ecosport has manual transmission. 2003 Ford Ecosport will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Chevrolet Monte Carlo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Monte Carlo | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1979 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2490 mm |