1979 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 2005 Kia Optima
To start off, 2005 Kia Optima is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 58 kg more than 2005 Kia Optima.
Because 1979 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Kia Optima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 2005 Kia Optima | |
Make | Chevrolet | Kia |
Model | Monte Carlo | Optima |
Year Released | 1979 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 2671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 170 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1545 kg | 1487 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2710 mm |