1979 Chevrolet Monza vs. 2002 Pontiac Grand Am
To start off, 2002 Pontiac Grand Am is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chevrolet Monza. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chevrolet Monza would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Pontiac Grand Am is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Pontiac Grand Am weights approximately 147 kg more than 1979 Chevrolet Monza.
Because 1979 Chevrolet Monza is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Chevrolet Monza. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Pontiac Grand Am, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Pontiac Grand Am has automatic transmission and 1979 Chevrolet Monza has manual transmission. 1979 Chevrolet Monza will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Pontiac Grand Am will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Chevrolet Monza | 2002 Pontiac Grand Am | |
Make | Chevrolet | Pontiac |
Model | Monza | Grand Am |
Year Released | 1979 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2474 cc | 3491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 170 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 1413 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2740 mm |