1979 Chevrolet Suburban vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chevrolet Suburban. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chevrolet Suburban would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Chevrolet Suburban weights approximately 1410 kg more than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Because 1979 Chevrolet Suburban is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Smart Fortwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Chevrolet Suburban will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Chevrolet Suburban (286 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (92 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1979 Chevrolet Suburban will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Chevrolet Suburban | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Smart |
Model | Suburban | Fortwo |
Year Released | 1979 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 286 Nm | 92 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 2230 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5480 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 1867 mm |